Comments and questions on:
NDP-S014 - Michael Allen - Chelston Rise
| NDP-S014 - Michael Allen - Chelston Rise | |||
| Comment no.: | Q215 | Date: | 22/02/2014 13:30 |
| Comment by: | NDP Working Party | Post code: | NN9 6AP - Water Lane |
| Following public consultation, the land owner has now submitted a revised proposition for this site: NDP-S014. The revised proposition envisages 6-8 smaller houses in a short cul-de-sac of mews housing, designed to resemble a traditional range of two-storey brick farm buildings, enclosing a cobbled courtyard. | |||
| Comment no.: | Q069 | Date: | 23/01/2014 09:57 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C002 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. Does the mains sewer actually have the capacity to handle the additional houses you propose, especially if WPG's proposals are accepted by the Village? A. Ultimately it is the responsibility of Anglian Water to provide adequate mains sewerage capacity for sites that are granted planning permission. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q068 | Date: | 23/01/2014 09:55 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C002 | Post code: | NN9 6AU - Chelston Rise |
| Q. What is your provision for sewerage? A. We are currently proposing a packaged sewage treatment plant for the site if we were going it alone. If we joined up with WPG then we would combine to use the mains sewer provision. A packaged sewage plant would clean the water and then discharge into the water course. Q. But isn't the area already flooded? A. No there is surface water as everywhere at the moment but this area is not considered by the Environment Agency as a flood risk. Q. What did the Environment Agency say about your proposal to discharge into the water course? A. The Environment Agency always prefer to use mains sewerage but a modern sewage treatment plant can be used where such mains provision isn't available. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q067 | Date: | 23/01/2014 09:50 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C002 | Post code: | NN9 6AW - Duchy Close |
| Q. Why have you changed your proposal from the one that was rejected? A. We saw the opportunity to promote this site for affordable housing as part of the call for aspirational sites. |
|||