Comments and questions on:
NDP-S015 - Steve Craythorn - Water Lane
| NDP-S015 - Steve Craythorn - Water Lane | |||
| Comment no.: | Q214 | Date: | 22/02/2014 13:30 |
| Comment by: | NDP Working Party | Post code: | NN9 6AP - Water Lane |
| Following public consultation, the land owner has now submitted a revised proposition for this site: NDP-S015. The revised proposition is largely unchanged and is for a single bespoke-designed dwelling on the site. | |||
| Comment no.: | Q139 | Date: | 05/02/2014 17:12 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C004 | Post code: | NN9 6AP - Water Lane |
| Residents' Discussion on Craythorn Site C. My concern is the first aspirational site NDP-S015. If Duchy Field goes ahead then there is a new access for Steve’s field and therefore there could be more houses developed on it whatever the current owner says. We need more assurances that this would only be one property. C. There are 3 or 4 of us who could lose our view if Steve develops his field, so clearly we are very concerned about the positioning of the property which is on much higher ground than ours. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q138 | Date: | 05/02/2014 16:23 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C004 | Post code: | NN9 6AW - Duchy Close |
| C. I really don't understand why you don't just create an access from Duchy Field.
A. We want our proposal to be considered on its own merits. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q137 | Date: | 05/02/2014 16:22 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C004 | Post code: | NN9 6AF - Wateryard |
| Q. Doesn't this count as "backland" development, something that we don't normally see in this Village? A. It is backland development and we think a good use of land. There are other examples of such developments in the Village. |
|||