Comments and questions on:
NDP-S019 - WPG - Chelston Rise
Previous page Next page All comments
| NDP-S019 - WPG - Chelston Rise | |||
| Comment no.: | Q075 | Date: | 23/01/2014 11:26 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C002 | Post code: | NN9 6AU - Chelston Rise |
| Q. If your plans don't get included in the Neighbourhood Plan will you come back again with another proposal. A. Yes we always say to clients that time is on their side if they can wait. We are open about the fact that our clients are keen to see some development on their site. It is simply a case of how much and when. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q074 | Date: | 23/01/2014 11:24 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C002 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. How many properties are you proposing to demolish? A. Three for the schemes as proposed Q. This seems to be a waste and wrong for the residents whose home this currently is. Why is it necessary? A. It suited the schemes we were proposing but if this is a problem, we can avoid it. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q073 | Date: | 23/01/2014 11:21 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C002 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. Is it true that you have put clauses into the contracts of tenants and residents that would prevent them objecting to proposed developments? A. Yes this was done but in recent correspondence NDP-0154 we believe that we have answered this and would now wish to encourage all residents to engage with the process. Everyone should feel free to comment without restriction. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q072 | Date: | 23/01/2014 11:19 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C002 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. How is 150 additional cars using the Caldecott Road a benefit to the existing residents? A. Being completely honest, it isn't a benefit, we do understand that. |
|||