Comments and questions on:
NDP-S004 - Sue & John Chapman - Caldecott
| NDP-S004 - Sue & John Chapman - Caldecott | |||
| Comment no.: | Q225 | Date: | 22/02/2014 13:30 |
| Comment by: | NDP Working Party | Post code: | NN9 6AP - Water Lane |
| Following public consultation, the original proposal NDP-S004 has now been submitted as 2 separate propositions.Residents will be able to vote separately on each proposition. The properties proposed are both for use by the land owner and family. | |||
| Comment no.: | Q052 | Date: | 17/01/2014 12:47 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C001 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. Would you have put forward this site if the call for aspirational sites hadn't happened? A. Yes both of the proposed dwellings have previously been the subject of planning applications. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q036 | Date: | 17/01/2014 12:18 |
| Comment by: | Adrian Dale | Post code: | NN9 6AP - Water Lane |
| Q. Would these be considered as two separate dwellings with a shared drive and garden or one property with one dwelling ancillary to the other? A. They would be two separate properties with shared drive access |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q035 | Date: | 17/01/2014 12:16 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C001 | Post code: | NN9 6AP - Water Lane |
| Q. As you haven't worked out the details yet, are you basically seeking to register the plot as suitable for 2 dwellings at some point in the future. A. Yes, we have failed to get planning approval for both properties at various points in the 1990s because the plot was then technically outside the boundary of Caldecott. We are using this opportunity to establish that we can build. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q034 | Date: | 17/01/2014 12:13 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C001 | Post code: | NN9 6AD - Sawyers Crescent |
| Q. What materials would be proposed for the new dwelling? A. To be worked out but it would probably need to be stone in order to fit in with the other properties near by. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q033 | Date: | 17/01/2014 12:12 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C001 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. What timescales are you proposing for development? A. Within 5 years for the new dwelling, within 10 years for the barn conversion or replacement - finances being the constraint. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q032 | Date: | 17/01/2014 12:10 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C001 | Post code: | NN9 6AW - Duchy Close |
| Q. Surely if you are now saying that there is a possibility that the barn would need to be demolished, then your aspiration should be for two new dwellings on the site, not one plus a conversion. A. Fair point but we haven't worked out any details yet. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q031 | Date: | 17/01/2014 12:04 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C001 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. The current sewerage provision for the existing barn goes across private property and is currently subject to a contractual dispute. No other properties can be connected to this private sewer branch. What is proposed for sewerage services for the new property? A. No detail has been worked out but if there was a problem that couldn't be resolved contractually, a new sewer branch could be connected directly to the road. Update (25/01/2014) - the contractual issue has now been resolved to the satisfaction of both parties. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q030 | Date: | 17/01/2014 12:01 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C001 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. The plot for the second proposed dwelling is very small - what sort of dwelling is proposed? A. A 2 storey 3 bedroom dwelling is envisaged but no details have yet been worked out. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q004 | Date: | 17/01/2014 09:04 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C001 | Post code: | NN9 6AR - Caldecott |
| Q. You say in your application that a barn conversion would be proposed but in your presentation you suggested that it might be knocked down and replaced with a dwelling. Which is it? A. The structural state of the barn isn't clear and would need to be discussed with an architect to decide whether the conversion would be feasible. |
|||