Comments and questions on:
NDP-S008 - Keith Carr - Raunds Road
Previous page Next page All comments
| NDP-S008 - Keith Carr - Raunds Road | |||
| Comment no.: | Q104 | Date: | 24/01/2014 11:18 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C003 | Post code: | NN9 6AB - Raunds Road |
| C. A new link road would create the future potential for further development along that road length and then a housing estate - of say 50 houses. Is this what we really want? The general reaction was NO! |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q103 | Date: | 24/01/2014 11:17 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C003 | Post code: | NN9 6AB - Raunds Road |
| C. I don't like the idea of a link road. It might take traffic from the centre of the Village but could encourage this to become a rat run for people from Raunds going to Kimbolton. This provoked lots of discussion about how traffic gets from Raunds to Kimbolton. There was a general view that the link road would not be a good idea with one person supporting it as a means of removing traffic from the centre of the Village to help with parking issues. A. We are making the offer so that the Village has options to consider. It isn't key to our proposal. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q102 | Date: | 24/01/2014 11:26 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C003 | Post code: | NN9 6AE - St Georges Row |
| Q. You are proposing 13/14 houses which seems to be cramming them in when you take into account garages. We need to make sure that the density looks appropriate. A. We think that this number of houses is the right number for the site but agree that the density needs to be appropriate for the site and would be happy to discuss it with the Village. |
|||
| Comment no.: | Q101 | Date: | 24/01/2014 11:11 |
| Comment by: | Session NDP-C003 | Post code: | NN9 6AB - Raunds Road |
| Q. How far back would you be proposing to set these houses? A. We haven't worked out the detail as it depends on the vehicle access allowed. However, we think it needs to be at least 15m back so that it doesn't create a "closed in" feel along the road. |
|||